Monthly Archives: March 2025

PHINZ has recently appointed a new Chair to the Board and we are delighted to announce that Joe Lyth, Director of WEL Architecture, has enthusiastically stepped into this role to lead our organisation in 2025 and beyond. He takes over from Guy Shaw who has been in the role of Acting Chair for the past few months.

We would like to take this opportunity to also thank Guy for his outstanding commitment and support. He will resume his role as Treasurer on the Board.

Joe has a vast amount of knowledge and expertise and we know that our organisation is in great hands but we will let Joe tell you more on his thoughts and vision for the next chapter:

“Designing and building lower energy, lower carbon, healthier homes and buildings, is a challenge facing the whole construction industry. This means homes and buildings that use less materials alongside less energy, that work with their context and local environment without imposing on it, and that utilise healthier, less impactful products, systems and materials, for both people and planet.

The Passive House process is a key part of achieving this goal, with measurable performance and a proven track record of producing buildings of higher quality, comfort and durability, in all climates. My family and I have first-hand experience of this, through producing our own Certified Passive House home on a standard budget, and we have seen the results – it does what it says on the tin!

Yet Passive House is one part of the picture, with other bodies, individuals, rating and certification schemes covering areas such as biodiversity, materiality, waste reduction, liveability, and so forth. These are all part of the same pathway towards better buildings and need to be supporting each other towards achieving this goal.

In taking the role of Board Chair at Passive House Institute New Zealand, my aim is to work towards fostering more collaboration, to clarify the place of Passive House and its significance in achieving energy efficient, climate resilient buildings for Aotearoa New Zealand; and to support anyone on their journey, whatever their point on the route. I look forward to working with everyone on the way!”

Share this:

Te Tōpūtanga o te Whare Korou ki Aotearoa, Passive House Institute NZ (PHINZ) has voiced its concerns regarding the proposed changes to the Building Code’s insulation requirements (H1) in a recent submission to the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE). PHINZ believes that the proposed changes, while well-intentioned, represent incrementalism and are a step in the wrong direction. Instead, PHINZ proposes an alternative approach that they believe is necessary to achieve the desired outcomes for New Zealand’s built environment.

Key points of PHINZ’s proposed alternative approach include:

  • Replacing the current prescriptive and calculation methods with a predictive modeling approach based on ISO 52016.
  • Shifting the focus from minimum R-values to minimum absolute thermal performance levels.
  • Adopting the caps from the Building for Climate Change document.
  • Allowing a transition period to the implementation of the first cap of 24 months.

Predictive Modeling Approach
PHINZ strongly supports the transition to a predictive modeling approach based on ISO 52016. This allows for a more accurate and flexible assessment of a building’s energy efficiency compared to the current prescriptive methods.

Minimum Absolute Thermal Performance Levels
Instead of relying solely on minimum R-values, PHINZ recommends shifting the focus to minimum absolute thermal performance levels. This means setting specific targets for the amount of energy a building is allowed to consume, rather than just specifying the thermal resistance of individual building elements. This approach encourages a more holistic view of building performance and promotes innovation in building design and construction.

Building for Climate Change Caps
PHINZ proposes adopting the caps from the Building for Climate Change document, which outlines a roadmap for reducing emissions from buildings in New Zealand. These caps would set progressively stricter limits on the energy consumption of new buildings, driving significant improvements in energy efficiency over time.

Transition Period
To allow the industry to adapt to these changes, PHINZ suggests a transition period of 24 months or more to the implementation of the first cap. This would give builders, designers, and manufacturers sufficient time to adjust their practices and product offerings, ensuring a smooth shift towards more energy-efficient buildings.

Conclusion
PHINZ believes that their alternative approach is crucial for improving the energy efficiency of buildings in New Zealand. They urge MBIE to give their feedback careful consideration before finalizing any decisions on the proposed changes.

Share this: